2014
DOI: 10.4308/hjb.21.4.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Terminal His-Tagged AtTPR7 Interactions with Hsp70 and Hsp90 Proteins

Abstract: Post-translational protein import into organelles is an important process to maintain cellular functions. During preprotein transport in the cytosol, chaperones, such as heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), are functioning to prevent aggregation and to maintain the correct protein folding of preproteins. This research was conducted in order to understand the chaperone-mediated, post-translational import of preproteins into the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis thaliana. AtTPR7 (A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 The first possibility for enzymatic inactivity of ASPase A3 was the 6×Histidine residue-tag in C-terminal of protein that may interfere with protein folding, oligomerization and enzyme functionality. 3,33-35 , However, this tag is present in ASPase A1and hence rules out its adverse effect on the activity. The more possible reason for the observed activity difference can be attributed to the high sequence difference (44% similarity) between these two homologs due to the sequence divergence during the evolution may have rendered one of the proteins inactive while the other preserved the activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The first possibility for enzymatic inactivity of ASPase A3 was the 6×Histidine residue-tag in C-terminal of protein that may interfere with protein folding, oligomerization and enzyme functionality. 3,33-35 , However, this tag is present in ASPase A1and hence rules out its adverse effect on the activity. The more possible reason for the observed activity difference can be attributed to the high sequence difference (44% similarity) between these two homologs due to the sequence divergence during the evolution may have rendered one of the proteins inactive while the other preserved the activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%