2008
DOI: 10.21608/besps.2008.37030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide, Homocysteine and Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Gene Polymorphism in Elderly Depressed and Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, homocysteine and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism (TT, CT or CC) in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment or depression, and to determine the association between TT genotype and both homocysteine and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide on one-hand and depressive and cognitive scores on other-hand. Material and Methods: This study included 60 elderly patients, subdivided into, patients with depression,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies were published from 2000 to 2020. Overall, in this meta‐analysis, 46 studies, 17,22‐66 which enrolled a total of 34 873 participants (mean age = 56.5 years), were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All studies were published from 2000 to 2020. Overall, in this meta‐analysis, 46 studies, 17,22‐66 which enrolled a total of 34 873 participants (mean age = 56.5 years), were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 538 potentially relevant studies were retrieved from the four databases. After 185 duplicates and 318 studies according to titles and abstracts were eliminated, the full texts of 35 articles were examined in detail; only eight papers [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] met all inclusion criteria, including four English [36][37][38][39] and four Chinese [40][41][42][43] articles. The detailed search process is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%