2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N-Type Thermoelectric AgBiPbS3 with Nanoprecipitates and Low Thermal Conductivity

Jinfeng Dong,
Dan Zhang,
Jiawei Liu
et al.

Abstract: Thermoelectric sulfide materials are of particular interest due to the earth-abundant and cost-effective nature of sulfur. Here, we report a new n-type degenerate semiconductor sulfide, AgBiPbS3, which adopts a Fm3̅m structure with a narrow band gap of ∼0.32 eV. Despite the homogeneous distribution of elements at the scale of micrometer, Ag2S nanoprecipitates with dimensions of several nanometers were detected throughout the matrix. AgBiPbS3 exhibits a low room-temperature lattice thermal conductivity of 0.88 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band structure of the rhombohedral phase 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 reveals a notably smaller band gap of 0.48 eV (Figure 3a, an enlarged image is shown in Figure S9a) compared to the large band gap of 0.85 eV in pristine Pnmastructured GeSe. 22 For hypothetical rhombohedral phase GeSe, the computed band gap is around 0.46 eV, 40 similar to the value for 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 . The congruence in band gaps between rhombohedral phase GeSe and 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 implies that this modest band gap is not primarily caused by the introduction of Li, Bi, and Te.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The band structure of the rhombohedral phase 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 reveals a notably smaller band gap of 0.48 eV (Figure 3a, an enlarged image is shown in Figure S9a) compared to the large band gap of 0.85 eV in pristine Pnmastructured GeSe. 22 For hypothetical rhombohedral phase GeSe, the computed band gap is around 0.46 eV, 40 similar to the value for 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 . The congruence in band gaps between rhombohedral phase GeSe and 28GeSe-4LiBiTe 2 implies that this modest band gap is not primarily caused by the introduction of Li, Bi, and Te.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…30−33 ing can stabilize the compound exceptionally well in highsymmetry structures, resulting in low lattice thermal conductivity and improved ZTs. 33−35 This has been evidenced in systems such as AgSbTe 2 -MnTe, 36 SnSe-AgSbTe 2 , 36−38 AgBi-(Se,S) 2 -Pb(Se,S), 39,40 and Cu 2 SnSe 3 -AgGaNa. 41 Previous studies on GeSe have also shown positive results by altering the crystal structure, 42−45 which motivates further investigation into the mechanisms underpinning the structure−performance relationship.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. Although many of the TE materials can achieve high zT s of >2, such as GeTe, 23–34 PbTe, 35–39 and SnSe, 40–44 and others exhibit peak performances in the medium temperature range (473–973 K), 45–53 such TE materials will not be considered for discussion in this review, as they overlap with the operating temperature range of the much more efficient existing heat cycle of the molten salt coolant. Instead, for reliable performance on the plasma-facing surfaces, one should select from the tried and tested high temperature (873–1273 K) TE materials that have been used or assessed for RTGs in deep space probes, such as Si 1− x Ge x , La 3− x Te 4 and Yb 14 MgSb 11 zintls.…”
Section: High Temperature Thermoelectric Materials For Fusion Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduced carrier mobility can be compensated by several mitigating strategies such as (i) controlled doping of HEMs, which can enhance the carrier concentration. 119 (ii) Band structure engineering which may involve adjusting the relative concentrations of the different cationic species to optimize the band alignment and minimize carrier scattering, thus enhancing carrier mobility. (iii) Interface engineering to reduce scattering and improve charge carrier mobility can be an effective strategy by optimizing interfaces between different phases or domains within HEMs.…”
Section: Introduction To Hems and Their Potential Use In Thermoelectr...mentioning
confidence: 99%