2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N170 adaptation effect for repeated faces and words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repetition enhancement effects on the ERP amplitude have been (Morel et al, 2009), however, unlike the current experiments, stimulus repeats occurred at a latency of greater than one minute. Most studies reporting effects of short-latency stimulus repeats on the N/M170 report reductions in N/M170 amplitude to stimulus repetition (Kloth et al, 2010; Mercure et al, 2011; Eimer et al, 2011; Fu et al, 2012; Engell and McCarthy, 2014; Caharel et al, 2015; Cao et al, 2015; Feuerriegel et al, 2015; Simpson et al, 2015; Tian et al, 2015). That said, on the basis of the current experiments we cannot rule out the possibility that image repetitions may have had some influence on the ERP, since there is some evidence in the (auditory) ERP literature that repetition suppression and expectation suppression may interact (Todorovic & de Lange, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetition enhancement effects on the ERP amplitude have been (Morel et al, 2009), however, unlike the current experiments, stimulus repeats occurred at a latency of greater than one minute. Most studies reporting effects of short-latency stimulus repeats on the N/M170 report reductions in N/M170 amplitude to stimulus repetition (Kloth et al, 2010; Mercure et al, 2011; Eimer et al, 2011; Fu et al, 2012; Engell and McCarthy, 2014; Caharel et al, 2015; Cao et al, 2015; Feuerriegel et al, 2015; Simpson et al, 2015; Tian et al, 2015). That said, on the basis of the current experiments we cannot rule out the possibility that image repetitions may have had some influence on the ERP, since there is some evidence in the (auditory) ERP literature that repetition suppression and expectation suppression may interact (Todorovic & de Lange, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our results are consistent with previous observations in the visual domain. Recently, Cao et al (2014Cao et al ( , 2015 used a cross-category adaptation to examine the relationship between faces and words. They analyzed the electrophysiological responses (N170) to these stimuli separately, as a function of their preceding stimulus, belonging to either the same category or not.…”
Section: Category-specific Adaptation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that the P100 amplitude elicited by faces is different from that elicited by words (Mercure et al, 2011 ; Fu et al, 2012 ; Cao et al, 2015b ). In order to ensure that N170 amplitude differences could not be attributed to P100 amplitude differences between faces and Chinese characters, statistical analyses of the N170 amplitude focused on peak-to-peak measurements, for which baseline-to-peak P100 amplitudes were subtracted from baseline-to-peak N170 amplitudes (Itier and Taylor, 2002 ; Goffaux et al, 2003 ; Rossion et al, 2003 ; Bentin et al, 2007 ; Tian et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, many studies have demonstrated that N170 amplitudes are attenuated during face tests that are preceded by face adaptors rather than by non-face adaptors (e.g., houses), suggesting a face-related categorical adaptation effect when there is a short ISI (e.g., 200 ms) (Nemrodov and Itier, 2011 ; Cao et al, 2014b ). Similar to the face-related N170 categorical adaptation effect, word-related effects have been demonstrated using short ISIs (e.g., 200 ms) (Cao et al, 2014a , b , 2015b ). Previous studies have also demonstrated that objects of non-expertise cannot produce N170 categorical adaptation similar to that produced by objects of expertise (Cao et al, 2015a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation