2015
DOI: 10.4086/toc.2015.v011a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that the set up of induction we have in the proof of Lemma 3.2 is very similar to the set up used by Kopparty [Kop15] in the context of list decoding Multiplicity codes. More precisely, our induction is similar to what is used in constructing a power series expansion of a non-degenerate solution of the univariate Cauchy-Kovalevski differential equations, which are used in [Kop15].…”
Section: Similarities With Prgs Of Shaltiel and Umans [Su05 Uma03]mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also note that the set up of induction we have in the proof of Lemma 3.2 is very similar to the set up used by Kopparty [Kop15] in the context of list decoding Multiplicity codes. More precisely, our induction is similar to what is used in constructing a power series expansion of a non-degenerate solution of the univariate Cauchy-Kovalevski differential equations, which are used in [Kop15].…”
Section: Similarities With Prgs Of Shaltiel and Umans [Su05 Uma03]mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We also note that the set up of induction we have in the proof of Lemma 3.2 is very similar to the set up used by Kopparty [Kop15] in the context of list decoding Multiplicity codes. More precisely, our induction is similar to what is used in constructing a power series expansion of a non-degenerate solution of the univariate Cauchy-Kovalevski differential equations, which are used in [Kop15]. The key difference is that although we work with a multivariate setting (and hence deal with a partial differential equation of high order and high degree), the iterative proof of Lemma 3.2 resembles the list decoding algorithm for univariate multiplicity codes in [Kop15] (which deals with an ordinary differential equation of high order and high degree).…”
Section: Similarities With Prgs Of Shaltiel and Umans [Su05 Uma03]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example uniformly random codes achieve capacity, as do uniformly random linear codes [21,40,20]. Folded Reed-Solomon codes were the first explicit codes to provably achieve list-decoding capacity [22], followed by several others a few years later [23,34,26,45,15]. For the rest of this paper however, we will exclusively work in the model where the errors are stochastic.…”
Section: List Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several known list-decodable codes with efficient decoding algorithms, with varying parameters. This includes codes which use algebraic structure, such as Reed--Solomon codes [29,16], folded Reed--Solomon codes [28,14], multiplicity codes [24], algebraic-geometric codes [16,17], and constructions using a more combinatorial approach, such as those in [11,13,12]. Most of these constructions get parameters better than our constructions, and some of them get very close to optimal rate and alphabet size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%