2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2010.2046908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction

Abstract: A variant of the popular nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization (N3) algorithm is proposed for bias field correction. Given the superb performance of N3 and its public availability, it has been the subject of several evaluation studies. These studies have demonstrated the importance of certain parameters associated with the B-spline least-squares fitting. We propose the substitution of a recently developed fast and robust B-spline approximation routine and a modified hierarchical optimization scheme … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3,389
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,945 publications
(3,394 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
3,389
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…T1w and T2w images were brain‐extracted (FSL's Brain Extraction Tool; FSL 5.0.8; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) and corrected for bias field inhomogeneities 21. Each subject's T1w image was aligned to an age‐appropriate template22 using nonlinear registration 23.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T1w and T2w images were brain‐extracted (FSL's Brain Extraction Tool; FSL 5.0.8; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) and corrected for bias field inhomogeneities 21. Each subject's T1w image was aligned to an age‐appropriate template22 using nonlinear registration 23.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• N4 bias field correction ( Tustison et al, 2010 ) to remove magnetic field inhomogeneity effect: Bspline grid resolution = 400, number of iteration = 200 (at each grid resolution), convergence threshold = 0.001, Bspline order = 3, Spline distance = 400, number of histograms = 256 and shrink factor = 3.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the data were skull‐stripped by using the different MP2RAGE output volumes (UNI, T 1 map and INV2; see Marques et al, 2010). The INV2 (i.e., PDw) image was used to obtain a brain mask, as it provides the best intra‐ and extracranial tissue contrast, especially after removal of any RF bias field using ANTs' (Advanced Normalization Tools) N4BiasFieldRemoval tool (Tustison et al, 2010). Remaining non‐brain tissue was removed using probability maps of the dura mater and arteries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%