1991
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/24/18/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Na atom excitation in low energy H+Na collisions

Abstract: Experimental results for the integral cross sxtions forthe emission of Na(3p-3s) and Na(4p-3s) light after H + N a collisions at energies from 15 to 1500eVare reponed. The data are compared with model predictions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory measurements for the Na  resonance line at H beam energies above 10 eV indicate efficiencies as low as S H ≈ 0.01 (Fleck et al 1991). We are convinced that S H = 3 is not an artefact of our modelling, as the same code results in much lower efficiencies for simpler atoms like Mg or Al (Baumüller & Gehren 1996;Zhao et al 1998).…”
Section: Multmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Laboratory measurements for the Na  resonance line at H beam energies above 10 eV indicate efficiencies as low as S H ≈ 0.01 (Fleck et al 1991). We are convinced that S H = 3 is not an artefact of our modelling, as the same code results in much lower efficiencies for simpler atoms like Mg or Al (Baumüller & Gehren 1996;Zhao et al 1998).…”
Section: Multmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Motivated by Steenbock and Holweger's work, Fleck et al (1991) performed an experimental study of Na(3s) + H → Na(3p) + H at low energies (15-1500 eV), though due to experimental difficulties, not down to near the threshold (2.1 eV), which is the relevant regime for the temperatures of interest. The results were compared with theory by Mo & Riera (1992) at energies above 200 eV.…”
Section: Quantum Collision Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, where comparisons with experimental data or theoretical results can be made, the Drawin recipe overestimates the cross-sections by one to six orders of magnitude (e.g. Fleck et al 1991;Barklem et al 2003). Corrections to the Drawin cross-sections are suggested by Lambert (1993) to compensate for these differences.…”
Section: Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%