“…The discrepancy between predicted and apparent NKA and NHE3 sizes may be explained by intrinsic limitations in Western blotting for precisely determining protein size ( Bass et al, 2017 ; Gwozdz and Dorey, 2017 ), together with the presence of post-translational modifications and isoforms (see Harter et al, 2021 , for a case of a fish NHE with an alternative start codon that results in a smaller-than-predicted protein). For example, the predicted size of NHE3 is 97 kDa in climbing perch Anabas testudineus , 94 kDa in killifish Fundulus heteroclitus and 93 kDa in rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus , yet their apparent Western blot sizes are ∼85 kDa ( Chen et al, 2017 ), ∼77 kDa ( Edwards et al, 2005 ) and ∼80 kDa ( Biemesderfer et al, 1997 ), respectively. Although many studies have previously used the same anti-NHE3 antibodies as us for immunohistochemistry in other fish species ( Blondeau-Bidet et al, 2019 ; Christensen et al, 2012 ; Hiroi and McCormick, 2012 ; Seo et al, 2013 ; Wright et al, 2016 ), to our knowledge only Wright et al (2016) performed Western blots and did not report the predicted size of the immunoreactive band.…”