2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NA49 Collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

43
670
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(719 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
43
670
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental indications of the existence of Θ + [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], the first explicitly pentaquark baryon, as well negative results of the search for the Θ + [12][13][14][15], require a deep revision of our views on many aspects of phenomenology of strongly interacting particles. There also exist positive [16] and negative [15,17] reports on the search of another pentaquark member of the antidecuplet, the Ξ 3/2 , as well as a positive report on the search for an anti-charmed baryon state [18]. While several hundred papers appeared since the first announcement of the Θ + signal [1], none of them tried to approach the issue of pentaquark baryons using the most general and model-independent method of the (approximate) flavor SU(3) symmetry of strong interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental indications of the existence of Θ + [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], the first explicitly pentaquark baryon, as well negative results of the search for the Θ + [12][13][14][15], require a deep revision of our views on many aspects of phenomenology of strongly interacting particles. There also exist positive [16] and negative [15,17] reports on the search of another pentaquark member of the antidecuplet, the Ξ 3/2 , as well as a positive report on the search for an anti-charmed baryon state [18]. While several hundred papers appeared since the first announcement of the Θ + signal [1], none of them tried to approach the issue of pentaquark baryons using the most general and model-independent method of the (approximate) flavor SU(3) symmetry of strong interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the purpose of the present paper to examine if the SU(3) symmetry alone is able to explain, or -more modestly -to accommodate further exotics that follow inevitably from the discovery of Θ + . Experimentally another exotic state, namely Ξ −− 3/2 (1860) (here subscript 3/2 refers to isospin), has been already announced by NA49 experiment at CERN [29]. Theoretically, it is clear that there must be other cryptoexotic states which span antidecuplet of flavor SU (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, but showing the spectra of various particles produced at mid-y in central Pb-Pb collisions at high √ sNN , where the factor (1/2π) on the vertical axis is removed in some cases and Nevt if available denotes the particle number which can be removed. The symbols represent the experimental data measured by the NA49 [34,35,36] and ALICE [37] Collaborations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the p T (m T ) spectra of positively and negatively charged pions (π + and π − ), positively and negatively charged kaons (K + and K − ), protons and antiprotons (p andp) produced at mid-(pseudo)rapidity (mid-y or mid-η) measured in central gold-gold (Au-Au) collisions at the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) by the E866 [24], E895 [25,26], and E802 [27,28] Collaborations and at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) by the STAR [29,30,31] and PHENIX [32,33] Collaborations, in central leadlead (Pb-Pb) collisions at the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) by the NA49 Collaboration [34,35,36] and at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) by the ALICE Collaboration [37], as well as in inelastic (INEL) proton-proton (pp) collisions at the SPS by the NA61/SHINE Collaboration [38,39], at the RHIC by the PHENIX Collaboration [40], and at the LHC by the CMS Collaboration [41,42] are studied. The (two-component) standard distribution is used to fit the data and to extract T , T i , T 0 , and β T , as well as the excitation functions of parameters (the energy dependent parameters).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%