Conventionally used spectrometric techniques (ICP-OES, ICP-MS) usually
involve time-consuming sample preparation procedure of sample dissolution
which requires the usage of aggressive and toxic chemicals. The need for
suitable and sustainable analytical methods for direct multi-elemental
analysis of plant samples has been increased in recent years. Spectrometric
techniques for direct sample analysis (INAA, XRF) have been applied in
environmental studies and various fields of screening tests. Nevertheless,
these techniques are not commonly used for plant sample analysis and their
performances need to be evaluated. This research aimed to assess how
reliable non-destructive techniques are in the determination of elements in
plants compared to conventionally used spectrometric techniques. A total of
49 plant samples of four conifer species (Pinus nigra, Abies alba, Taxus
baccata, and Larix decidua) were measured using two conventionally used
(ICP-MS, ICP-OES) and two non-destructive techniques (WD-XRF, INAA). The
comparison was performed by investigation of relative ratios of
concentrations and by correlation analysis. Moreover, precision of the
techniques was examined and compared. The quality control included analysis
of NIST pine needles certified reference material (1575a) using all examined
techniques. Our results suggest that additional analytical and quality
control steps are necessary for reaching the highest accuracy of
multi-elemental analysis.