2020
DOI: 10.1055/a-1067-3908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nachweis von Actinobacillus equuli ssp. equuli bei Saugferkeln mit eitriger Polyarthritis und Tendovaginitis

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Actinobacillus equuli ssp. equuli ist ein opportunistischer Erreger des Pferdes, der u. a. als Auslöser der Fohlenfrühlähme bekannt ist. Beim Schwein gibt es vergleichsweise wenige Beschreibungen zu Erkrankungen bedingt durch diese gramnegative Bakterienspezies. Der Bericht beschreibt den Ausbruch einer Infektion in einem kombinierten Zuchtbetrieb mit angeschlossener Mast. Im September 2018 traten bei etwa einem Drittel neugeborener Saugferkel a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While focussing on equine clinical strains, also novel phenotypic and genetic data on acquired resistance in A. equuli were obtained. In general, identification of A. equuli is considered difficult due to its close relationship to A. suis [ 32 , 56 ]. The use of the 16S rRNA gene was compared to a new MLST and whole genome SNP, showing that 16S rRNA gene sequencing was indeed least reliable in differentiating Actinobacillus species, while whole genome SNP analysis performed best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While focussing on equine clinical strains, also novel phenotypic and genetic data on acquired resistance in A. equuli were obtained. In general, identification of A. equuli is considered difficult due to its close relationship to A. suis [ 32 , 56 ]. The use of the 16S rRNA gene was compared to a new MLST and whole genome SNP, showing that 16S rRNA gene sequencing was indeed least reliable in differentiating Actinobacillus species, while whole genome SNP analysis performed best.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the 16S rRNA gene was compared to a new MLST and whole genome SNP, showing that 16S rRNA gene sequencing was indeed least reliable in differentiating Actinobacillus species, while whole genome SNP analysis performed best. The use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing was also shown to not provide sufficient resolution and lack of specificity in previous research on Bacillus and Actinobacillus species [ 56 , 57 ]. Interestingly, the Actinobacillus genomospecies 1 clade could be properly distinguished from other Actinobacillus species using the 16S rRNA gene only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%