SummaryAdministration of vasopressors or inotropes during liver transplant surgery is almost universal, as this procedure is often accompanied by massive haemorrhage, acid-base imbalance, and cardiovascular instability. However, the actual agents that should be used and the choice between a vasopressor and an inotrope strategy are not clear from existing published evidence. In this prospective, randomised, controlled and single-blinded study, we compared the effects of a vasopressor strategy on intra-operative blood loss and acid-base status with those of an inotrope strategy during living donor liver transplantation. Seventy-six adult liver recipients with decompensated cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of either phenylephrine at a dose of 0.3-0.4 lg.kg Patients undergoing liver transplantation for decompensated liver cirrhosis invariably demonstrate pathophysiological circulatory changes. Elevated intrahepatic vascular resistance induces dilatation of extrahepatic vessels, which is aggravated by overproduction and impaired hepatic metabolism of endogenous vasodilators such as nitric oxide [1]. Dilatation of extrahepatic vessels, including portosplanchnic vessels, redistributes body fluid from the central to the peripheral compartment, reducing effective blood flow to the major organs. Additionally, wide surgical dissection of porto-systemic collateral vessels and an inherent haemorrhagic