2012
DOI: 10.21236/ada568936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NAFDTD - A Near-field Finite Difference Time Domain Solver

Abstract: Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, ARLApproved for public release; distribution unlimited. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reduci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty sets in ( 86) and ( 87) are indicated by the shaded areas. The numerical data used in this example were simulated using the Near-Field Finite-Difference Time-Domain software package, NAFDTD, developed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) [189]. Fig.…”
Section: A Current Application: Ground Penetrating Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty sets in ( 86) and ( 87) are indicated by the shaded areas. The numerical data used in this example were simulated using the Near-Field Finite-Difference Time-Domain software package, NAFDTD, developed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) [189]. Fig.…”
Section: A Current Application: Ground Penetrating Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these difficulties, we derive the equation of the peak transmitted power for the case when the near-field radar scenario is simulated with the NAFDTD software (11), and the transmitter and receiver antennas are provided by infinitesimal dipoles. We first consider the narrowband case.…”
Section: Near-field Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in two shortcomings, i.e., scanning a large interrogation area is time consuming, and the short distance between the radar system and the potential targets poses potential danger to the radar operator. Different from the conventional system is a forwardlooking ground penetrating radar (FL-GPR), which has gained significant research interest in the last few decades [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. An FL-GPR system can be deployed on a moving platform, such as a vehicle, with antennas mounted on the roof top, and it interrogates the scene of interest using oblique incidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%