“…We can now avail ourselves of Proposition 3.3. Recall the elementary fact that if θ is a Kähler form on Y with volume one, then ε y (θ) Vol(θ) 1/n = 1 for all y ∈ Y , and that we always have equality in the case when Y is a Riemann surface; see, for example, [43,Theorem 4.6], or the explicit construction in [39, Lemma 5.5]. Thus, ε τ (2ω F S ) = 2 > 1 ε z 0 (ω) for all τ ∈ D ⊂ CP 1 , and so we may apply Proposition 3.3 to see that ε (z 0 ,0) (π * ω + 2p * ω F S ) = ε z 0 (ω).…”