2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naked-eye detection of Pd2+ ion using a highly selective fluorescent heterocyclic probe by “turn-off” response and in-vitro live cell imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey spectrum depicted the presence of peaks at 532.08, 285.08, and 399.08, which correspond to O 1s, N 1s, and C 1s, respectively (Figure ). , The deconvolution of C 1s spectra is shown in Figure b, which suggests the presence of 5 peaks at 283.72, 284.52, 285.30,286.20, and 287.65, which corresponds to CH 3 CO, C–C/CC, C–N/C–O, CN/CO, and HO–CO, respectively. , Figure c shows the deconvolution of N 1s spectra, which indicates the presence of 3 different peaks at 398.14, 399.68, and 401.05, which signifies the presence of C–N–C, C–N–H, and (C 3 )–N bond, respectively. The high-resolution spectra of the O 1s scan can be seen in Figure d and after deconvolution, it has 4 peaks at 530.56, 531.52, 532.56, and 533.42, which represent the functional groups as CO, C–OH, C–O–C, and HO–CO, respectively. We also determined the elemental analysis of C, N, and O, which comes out to be 59.58, 9.14, and 31.28%, respectively. The presence of these highly electronegative groups on CNS may be attributed to the binding of a highly positive divalent ion of Cu 2+ making it a potential sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The survey spectrum depicted the presence of peaks at 532.08, 285.08, and 399.08, which correspond to O 1s, N 1s, and C 1s, respectively (Figure ). , The deconvolution of C 1s spectra is shown in Figure b, which suggests the presence of 5 peaks at 283.72, 284.52, 285.30,286.20, and 287.65, which corresponds to CH 3 CO, C–C/CC, C–N/C–O, CN/CO, and HO–CO, respectively. , Figure c shows the deconvolution of N 1s spectra, which indicates the presence of 3 different peaks at 398.14, 399.68, and 401.05, which signifies the presence of C–N–C, C–N–H, and (C 3 )–N bond, respectively. The high-resolution spectra of the O 1s scan can be seen in Figure d and after deconvolution, it has 4 peaks at 530.56, 531.52, 532.56, and 533.42, which represent the functional groups as CO, C–OH, C–O–C, and HO–CO, respectively. We also determined the elemental analysis of C, N, and O, which comes out to be 59.58, 9.14, and 31.28%, respectively. The presence of these highly electronegative groups on CNS may be attributed to the binding of a highly positive divalent ion of Cu 2+ making it a potential sensor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This distortion suggests that the synthesized CNSs operate as a "turn-off" fluorescence sensor for Cu 2+ ions due to the static quenching phenomenon. 70,71 In conclusion, the synthesized CNS, characterized by its negative surface charge and the interaction potential of its diverse functional groups, serves as an effective 'turn-off' fluorescence sensor for Cu 2+ ions due to the CHEQ (chelation-enhanced quenching) effect. The elucidation of static quenching mechanisms through fluorescence titration, Stern−Volmer plots, and lifetime studies enhances our understanding of the intricate For the determination of detection and quantification limits, a linear plot showcasing the relationship between the Cu 2+ concentration and fluorescence intensity was obtained.…”
Section: Titration Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…S7, ESI†), which confirmed the occurrence of static quenching. 46 Furthermore, the fluorescence quenching mechanism of N-GQDs can also be evaluated using the Stern–Volmer equation (eqn (2) and (3)). here, F and F 0 represent the intensity of fluorescence in the absence and presence of Fe 3+ , [C] is the equilibrium concentration of the quencher, and K sv is the Stern–Volmer's quenching constant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S7, ESI †), which confirmed the occurrence of static quenching. 46 Furthermore, the fluorescence quenching mechanism of N-GQDs can also be evaluated using the Stern-Volmer equation (eqn ( 2) and ( 3)).…”
Section: Possible Sensing Mechanism For the Detection Of Fe 3+ Ions A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36] As an efficient fluorescence quencher, Pd 2+ could also be detected by using strong fluorescence probes by a fluorescence quenching mechanism. [37][38][39] However, fluorescence ''turn-on'' chemosensors are considered to be more efficient. Recently, several fluorescence enhanced probes have been reported for the detection of Pd 2+ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%