1973
DOI: 10.1177/003151257303700344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Name and Facial Feature Stereotyping

Abstract: 25 names and faces which had been previously scaled with respect to perceived degree of masculinity-femininity were presented to 28 Ss whose task was to match the name which seemed most appropriate to each of the photographs. The results indicated that Ss associated names with faces which had similar connotations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Requests for reprints should be sent to Martin E. Ford, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. sociated with different stereotypic conceptions; in particular, negative stereotypes are typically ascribed to names low in frequency or desirability (Allen, Brown, Dickinson, & Pratt, 1941;Bruning & Husa, 1972;Bruning & Liebert, 1973;Buchanan & Bruning, 1971;Gladding & Farrar, 1982;Lawson, 1971;McDavid & Harari, 1966;Nelson 1977). These stereotypes are evidently well formed by the early school-age years (Bruning & Husa, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requests for reprints should be sent to Martin E. Ford, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. sociated with different stereotypic conceptions; in particular, negative stereotypes are typically ascribed to names low in frequency or desirability (Allen, Brown, Dickinson, & Pratt, 1941;Bruning & Husa, 1972;Bruning & Liebert, 1973;Buchanan & Bruning, 1971;Gladding & Farrar, 1982;Lawson, 1971;McDavid & Harari, 1966;Nelson 1977). These stereotypes are evidently well formed by the early school-age years (Bruning & Husa, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%