Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Dynamic Interconnection of Networks 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1080776.1080788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Names, addresses and identities in ambient networks

Abstract: 1Ambient Networks interconnect independent realms that may use different local network technologies and may belong to different administrative or legal entities. At the core of these advanced internetworking concepts is a flexible naming architecture based on dynamic indirections between names, addresses and identities. This paper gives an overview of the connectivity abstractions of Ambient Networks and then describes its naming architecture in detail, comparing and contrasting them to other related nextgener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FARA requires modifications in the network (i.e. for mapping) and on end-hosts, which does not facilitate its deployment [Ahlgren et al, 2005].…”
Section: End-host Non-standard Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FARA requires modifications in the network (i.e. for mapping) and on end-hosts, which does not facilitate its deployment [Ahlgren et al, 2005].…”
Section: End-host Non-standard Proposalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FARA is very generic and does not provides too much details that foster its implementation [125], despite including its early implementation in a tesbed. Moreover, the proposed architecture requires modification in endnodes and on the network side to enable mobility support [126].…”
Section: Forwarding Directive Association and Rendezvousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AN naming architecture adopts a layered naming model, with separation concepts borrowed from layered naming architecture [16] and HIP [17]. Dynamic bindings at different layers enable the basic mobility of nodes, 'bearers' and applications [25].…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%