2021
DOI: 10.1080/13875868.2021.1954186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Names for urban places and conceptual taxonomies: the view from Italian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our choice in using OSM for a dialectological and geolinguistic study seems justified on two grounds: we have been able to extract a sample size superior to previous studies (e.g. Ursini & Samo, 2022b); and the VGI philosophy underpinning this platform guarantees the local, grassroots origins of the data (see Sui and Goodchild, 2011). Our findings are thus methodologically consistent with previous work in Italian toponomastics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First, our choice in using OSM for a dialectological and geolinguistic study seems justified on two grounds: we have been able to extract a sample size superior to previous studies (e.g. Ursini & Samo, 2022b); and the VGI philosophy underpinning this platform guarantees the local, grassroots origins of the data (see Sui and Goodchild, 2011). Our findings are thus methodologically consistent with previous work in Italian toponomastics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the first part, we extracted a total of 452,538 tokens distributed unevenly across regions. We thus obtained a far more voluminous sample than the one in (Ursini and Samo, 2022b), which extracted 213,218 tokens. In so doing, we increased possibilities to discover local/dialectal terms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations