1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00142406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Names on the maps of Venus: A pre-MAGELLAN review

Abstract: The topographic features on Venus are named with female names

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling of magnetic minerals on the Venus surface demonstrates that remnant magnetization is possible and perhaps has yet to be detected. Several spacecraft measurements have placed upper limits on the strength and location of crustal magnetization (Burba 1990;. However, latitudes south of 50°S remain viable for detection of surface remnant fields from an orbiter.…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of magnetic minerals on the Venus surface demonstrates that remnant magnetization is possible and perhaps has yet to be detected. Several spacecraft measurements have placed upper limits on the strength and location of crustal magnetization (Burba 1990;. However, latitudes south of 50°S remain viable for detection of surface remnant fields from an orbiter.…”
Section: Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spacecraft missions including Mariner 2 and 10 and Venera 9–12 failed to detect an Earth‐like magnetosphere at Venus (e.g., Russell, ). Venera 4 landed at 19° North, 38° East in Eistla Regio—then called the Eisila region (Burba, )—measuring magnetic fields down to 25 km but failing to detect crustal remanence (Dolginov et al, ; Russell, ). Pioneer Venus Orbiter supplied the strictest upper limit on any present‐day global field: ~10 − 5 times Earth ' s magnetic moment (Phillips & Russell, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%