“…Furthermore, the estimated photodecomposition cross sections were relatively low (∼10 −21 cm 2 ), indicating that the rutile (011) surface does not possess higher photocatalytic activity in comparison with other rutile TiO 2 surfaces. In concluding this section, we point out SPM work on the photodecomposition of stearic acid on the TiO 2 (110) surface by Kobayashi et al 149,150 and by Sawunyama et al 151,152 Although these studies do not present atomically resolved images, they provide insights into the photodecomposition of stearic acid films on TiO 2 (110) (in air) using the stark contrast in height revealed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) between regions with and without adsorbed stearate. For example, Figure 24 illustrates the photodecomposition of stearic acid islands on TiO 2 (110) by Sawunyama et al 152 as detected by AFM.…”