2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13596-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanobiosensors in Food Science and Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of polymer particles having a diameter of 0.1 m would be about 60 m 2 , and the total surface area is inversely proportional to the diameter [17]. [20][21][22]. The principal advantages to use biosensors are high specificity and sensitivity, being simple to use, low-cost instrumentation, fast response times, minimum sample pretreatments, and ease of transport for in situ measurement [23].…”
Section: Parameters Corresponding To Particle Sizes Affecting the Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of polymer particles having a diameter of 0.1 m would be about 60 m 2 , and the total surface area is inversely proportional to the diameter [17]. [20][21][22]. The principal advantages to use biosensors are high specificity and sensitivity, being simple to use, low-cost instrumentation, fast response times, minimum sample pretreatments, and ease of transport for in situ measurement [23].…”
Section: Parameters Corresponding To Particle Sizes Affecting the Promentioning
confidence: 99%