2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.97.088101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanobubbles in Solid-State Nanopores

Abstract: From conductance and noise studies, we infer that nanometer-sized gaseous bubbles (nanobubbles) are the dominant noise source in solid-state nanopores. We study the ionic conductance through solid-state nanopores as they are moved through the focus of an infrared laser beam. The resulting conductance profiles show strong variations in both the magnitude of the conductance and in the low-frequency noise when a single nanopore is measured multiple times. Differences up to 5 orders of magnitude are found in the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
141
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
141
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This example might have some relevance for the modeling of solutes or cavities (e.g. nanobubbles) confined to one-dimensional channels or nanotubes in electrolyte solutions [21,22]. The calculations for this model system show that our main results are correct in form and do not depend on dimensionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This example might have some relevance for the modeling of solutes or cavities (e.g. nanobubbles) confined to one-dimensional channels or nanotubes in electrolyte solutions [21,22]. The calculations for this model system show that our main results are correct in form and do not depend on dimensionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Laser light has been identified as a source of low frequency noise and variation in ionic current through silicon nitride nanopores. 21 Another challenge introduced in our geometry is the pausing during DNA translocation. Figure 4 shows several individual traces of this translocation process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a thickness of few tens of nanometers provides a compromise between resolution and stability; this may partially explain why most of the conventional nanopores in solid state materials [35][36][37][38] have been sculpted in membranes with a thicknesses of ≈20 nm. The introduction of interfacial nanopores dramatically shifts this compromise: here the effective thickness of a nanopore with h = 100 nm is just ≈1.7 times higher than that of h = 4 nm; hence much thicker nanopores can be chosen without losing the resolution considerably.…”
Section: Bionanotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%