2019
DOI: 10.3390/nano9040652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanocarriers for Protein Delivery to the Cytosol: Assessing the Endosomal Escape of Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)-Poly(Ethylene Imine) Nanoparticles

Abstract: Therapeutic proteins and enzymes are a group of interesting candidates for the treatment of numerous diseases, but they often require a carrier to avoid degradation and rapid clearance in vivo. To this end, organic nanoparticles (NPs) represent an excellent choice due to their biocompatibility, and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs)-loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) NPs have recently attracted attention as versatile tools for targeted enzyme delivery. However, PLGA NPs are taken up by cells via end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NPs loaded with only QDs, Chl, or empty were also produced as controls. All the obtained NPs display hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 169 to 220 nm, that are typical of PLGA NPs obtained with this technique, [23,24] indicating small or negligible effect of either QDs or Chl on NP formation. Additionally, the zeta potential of all NPs is negative and around À 30 mV, as expected (Table S1).…”
Section: Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Nanoparticles Co-loaded With Chlomentioning
confidence: 81%
“…NPs loaded with only QDs, Chl, or empty were also produced as controls. All the obtained NPs display hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 169 to 220 nm, that are typical of PLGA NPs obtained with this technique, [23,24] indicating small or negligible effect of either QDs or Chl on NP formation. Additionally, the zeta potential of all NPs is negative and around À 30 mV, as expected (Table S1).…”
Section: Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Nanoparticles Co-loaded With Chlomentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This was independent of the type of ligand and also of the type of cell, since similar results were obtained in TWI and WT fibroblasts. This means that, while the targeting peptides should address NPs to a certain district in the organism, at the cellular level, they do not affect the expected fate of NPs, which in this case leads to the endolysosomal route ( 27 ). Together, our results indicate that GALC CLEA NPs can successfully vehiculate the enzyme inside cells and accumulate in the lysosomes, where GALC is supposed to perform its physiological activity, and that the preferred localization of delivered GALC in the lysosomes is not affected by the presence of targeting ligands on the carrier’s surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the case of clathrin-mediated uptake, endosomal escape of NPs must occur prior to lysosome degradation [56]. Using poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI), Galliani et al were able to show successful endosomal escape and cytoplasmic delivery of their nanoparticle cargo [58]. Actively targeting NPs to tumor-overexpressed receptors may also enable receptor-mediated cellular internalization without degradation by lysosomal compartments.…”
Section: Biological Barriers For Nanoparticle Delivery To Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%