2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanocarriers for resveratrol delivery: Impact on stability and solubility concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of nanoplatforms that have been proposed include liposomes [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], cyclodextrins [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], solid lipid nanoparticles [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], polymeric micelles [ 35 ], and polymeric nanoparticles [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. However, these carriers suffer from limitations related to poor stability, low drug loading, the use of organic solvents, and high production costs [ 39 ]. In contrast, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) exhibit several superior features in comparison to other nanocarriers such as a high drug loading capability due to their high surface area and pore volume, tunable mesopore size and pore/shape connectivity, easy surface functionalization, controllable degradability in biological environments, high in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, and a high level of clearance and excretion [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of nanoplatforms that have been proposed include liposomes [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], cyclodextrins [ 29 , 30 , 31 ], solid lipid nanoparticles [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], polymeric micelles [ 35 ], and polymeric nanoparticles [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. However, these carriers suffer from limitations related to poor stability, low drug loading, the use of organic solvents, and high production costs [ 39 ]. In contrast, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) exhibit several superior features in comparison to other nanocarriers such as a high drug loading capability due to their high surface area and pore volume, tunable mesopore size and pore/shape connectivity, easy surface functionalization, controllable degradability in biological environments, high in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, and a high level of clearance and excretion [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various approaches have been proposed to improve RSV biological activities after systemic and topical administration; these strategies include RSV incorporation into different types of nanocarriers and synthesis of prodrugs or RSV derivatives with improved chemical–physical characteristics compared to the parent drug [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. In particular, several studies suggest the feasibility of improving RSV effectiveness by synthesizing derivatives in which molecules that might exert a synergic effect are linked to RSV (i.e., RSV hybrids and codrugs) [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomedicine strategies can circumvent various disadvantages and potentiate the therapeutic benefits of repurposed antiviral molecules by increasing bioavailability, localizing the delivery to the infection sites (viral reservoir sites such as ACE 2 expressing cells, domains of viral S protein, cathepsinbinding sites), decreasing off-targeted effects, and weakening the resistance development mechanisms [56,57]. Nanocarriers can deliver a range of small molecules, biologicals (RNA interference, antibodies, proteins, antigens), peptides, and combined therapeutics as well [6,[58][59][60]. Nanocarriers also ensure the physical prevention of the biological molecules against the premature degradation in harsh biological environments, whilst evading the immune recognition and minimizing renal and/or hepatic clearance [6,61].…”
Section: Nanotechnology Direction For Sars-cov-2 Treatment and Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%