2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanocomposite MFI-alumina membranes via pore-plugging synthesisPreparation and morphological characterisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case of membrane M12 prepared on a 1.4-μm top layer support, a higher SF 6 permeance and a much lower n-/i-butane separation factor (3.6) is obtained. All these observations confirm the results already reported in a previous study [20], being attributed to a higher support reactivity in smaller macropores.…”
Section: Effect Of the Top-layer Pore Size On Pore Pluggingsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in the case of membrane M12 prepared on a 1.4-μm top layer support, a higher SF 6 permeance and a much lower n-/i-butane separation factor (3.6) is obtained. All these observations confirm the results already reported in a previous study [20], being attributed to a higher support reactivity in smaller macropores.…”
Section: Effect Of the Top-layer Pore Size On Pore Pluggingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The outer layer had a porosity of about 33%, whereas the porosity of the other two layers was about 30%. Prior to synthesis, the quality of the supports was tested by a gas-liquid displacement method [20]. Only supports displaying first-bubble pressures higher than 80 kPa using ethanol were used for membrane synthesis.…”
Section: Membrane Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations