2019
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanocrystalline Cu–ZnO as an Green Catalyst for One Pot Synthesis of 4,4′-((phenyl)methylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…White solid; R f = 0.54 (30% EtOAc/70% hexane); mp = 172–175 °C (lit. mp = 175–177 °C); 61 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 , 400 MHz): δ 11.96 (br s, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, 2H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.36 (m, 8H), 1.23 (s, 6H), 1.21 (s, 6H); 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 100 MHz): δ 204.8, 195.5, 148.7, 147.1, 134.1, 118.8, 115.7, 111.6, 54.4, 52.4, 47.1, 31.2, 29.8, 27.0; MS (APCI) m / z : [M + H] + calcd for C 25 H 33 O 6 428, found; IR V max = 2931, 1720, 1581, 1458, 1242, 1149, 1026, 871, 840, 763, 663 cm –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White solid; R f = 0.54 (30% EtOAc/70% hexane); mp = 172–175 °C (lit. mp = 175–177 °C); 61 1 H NMR (CDCl 3 , 400 MHz): δ 11.96 (br s, 2H), 6.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, 2H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.36 (m, 8H), 1.23 (s, 6H), 1.21 (s, 6H); 13 C NMR (CDCl 3 , 100 MHz): δ 204.8, 195.5, 148.7, 147.1, 134.1, 118.8, 115.7, 111.6, 54.4, 52.4, 47.1, 31.2, 29.8, 27.0; MS (APCI) m / z : [M + H] + calcd for C 25 H 33 O 6 428, found; IR V max = 2931, 1720, 1581, 1458, 1242, 1149, 1026, 871, 840, 763, 663 cm –1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature survey shows that the most common method for the synthesis of 4,4'-(phenylmethylene) bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) is the condensation of aldehydes with 3methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone. Several catalysts have been used for this reaction including Mohr's Salt, [25] Ni-guanidine@MCM-41 NPs, [26] PEG-400, [27] silica sulfuric acid, [28] sulfonated rice husk ash (RHA-SO 3 H), [29] sulfuric acid ([3-(3silicapropyl)sulfanyl]propyl)ester, [30] tetrakis(N-methylimidazolium-1-ylmethyl)methane tetra hydrogen sulfates, [31] Xanthan sulfuric acid, [32] [Et 3 NH][HSO 4 ], [33] 1-(carboxymethyl)pyridinium chloride {[cmpy]Cl}, [34] Na + -MMT-[pmim]HSO 4 , [35] cage like CuFe 2 O 4 hollow nanostructure, [36] Chitosan-SO 3 H (CTSA), [37] DCDBTSD, [38] guanidine hydrochloride, [39] lemon juice, [40] Mn-lysine complex on magnetic nanoparticles, [41] NPS-γ-Fe 2 O 3 , [42] SDBS, [43] K 2 CO 3 , [44] Pyridine trifluoroacetate, [45] Phosphomolybdic acid, [46] L-Proline, [47] Cu-ZnO, [48] ChCl:TA, [49] chickpea leaf exudates (CLE), [50] ZnO NPs, [51] and BPHCSF [52] However, most of these synthetic methods display some disadvantages such as employing strong acidic conditions, toxic reagents, expensive catalysts, tedious workup procedures, harsh reaction conditions, and low yields of the products that restrict their usage in practical applications. Considering these lacunas with already reported synthetic protocols, there is still scope for designing a suitable synthetic protocol, which is environmentally benign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%