2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016jd025037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanodust shedding and its potential influence on dust‐related phenomena in the mesosphere

Abstract: We explore the possibility that some meteoric smoke particles that collide with larger nanoparticles near the mesopause can escape from the larger particles by capturing surface electrons. If the process were sufficiently efficient, under certain conditions it would influence the responses of polar mesospheric summer echoes to artificial heating in a manner that is compatible with observations that are unexplained with previous models. The process would have a number of other possible consequences for nanopart… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a typical rocket speed of 800-1000 m s −1 , the fragmentation model and single projectile have roughly the same yield. We find that the predicted charge number for this velocity range is consistent with what has been measured with rocketborne Faraday cups (Havnes and Naesheim, 2007;Havnes et al, 2014). The grey shaded area shows values of the predicted charge yield where the ice particles have a capacitive coupling but are allowed to have a non-unity dielectric constant (cf.…”
Section: Ice-metal Collisionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For a typical rocket speed of 800-1000 m s −1 , the fragmentation model and single projectile have roughly the same yield. We find that the predicted charge number for this velocity range is consistent with what has been measured with rocketborne Faraday cups (Havnes and Naesheim, 2007;Havnes et al, 2014). The grey shaded area shows values of the predicted charge yield where the ice particles have a capacitive coupling but are allowed to have a non-unity dielectric constant (cf.…”
Section: Ice-metal Collisionssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As a third explanation, we must mention a recent development in charging mechanisms for mesospheric nanoparticles that may explain a possible physical mechanism, where larger MSPs can be more abundant in the fragment distribution at the top of a NLC/PMSE layer. In a recent work, Havnes and Hartquist () proposed a new mechanism where MSPs can scavenge electrons from larger ice particles (so called “nanodust shedding”) that can further affect the internal distribution of MSP sizes inside ice particles. The physical explanation is that the switching time of the polarized (“image”) potential on the surface of an ice particles is slow compared to the charging and escape rate of an impinging MSP.…”
Section: Derived Size Distributions Of Collision Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in our results below, h ∼ 0.1r p offers a good fit for rocket data. Note that we have disregarded polarization effects, as the characteristic polarization potential switching times for particles of sizes used here, are likely much longer than the collision time (or contact time) (Havnes and Hartquist, 2016). We employ the same parameterization of fragment size distribution in both the fragmentation-at-impact model (iron particles) and fragments-in-projectile model (ice particles containing meteoric smoke particles -MSPs), namely:…”
Section: Fragmentation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%