2019
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201903879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanofluidic Behaviors of Water and Ions in Covalent Triazine Framework (CTF) Multilayers

Abstract: Covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) hosting arrays of highly ordered sub‐2‐nm pores are expected to exhibit unusual nanofluidic behaviors, which may enable important applications such as desalination. Herein, nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations are applied to investigate transport of water and ions inside two typical CTFs—CTF‐1, and CTF‐2—having intrinsic pores of 1.2 and 1.5 nm, respectively. Their monolayers exhibit extremely high water permeance but weak ion rejection. CTF multilayers are then inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To accurately describe the ΔPdependent ion rejections, the intervals of ΔPs are smaller when the changes of ion rejections are faster, which are 5, 25, and 100 MPa with ΔPs of 10−100, 100−350, and 400−1000 MPa, respectively. Enhanced ion rejections with decreased ΔPs were also reported in many other materials, for example, graphene, 12 graphyne, 16 and COFs, 32 the staking layered structure of which afford one-dimensional straight pores such as CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…To accurately describe the ΔPdependent ion rejections, the intervals of ΔPs are smaller when the changes of ion rejections are faster, which are 5, 25, and 100 MPa with ΔPs of 10−100, 100−350, and 400−1000 MPa, respectively. Enhanced ion rejections with decreased ΔPs were also reported in many other materials, for example, graphene, 12 graphyne, 16 and COFs, 32 the staking layered structure of which afford one-dimensional straight pores such as CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Interestingly, the rejection rate of acid fuchsin with a smaller size (1.17 nm × 1.13 nm × 1.13 nm) than 1.4 nm also exceeded 90%. This phenomenon might be attributed to the offset or fully staggered pores originating from the random stack of CTF nanosheets, resulting in a reduced pore size. , The membranes exhibited a moderate rejection rate of methyl orange (56.9%). This is mainly because the methyl orange molecule possesses a much narrower dimension (1.13 nm × 0.42 nm × 0.61 nm) compared with that of acid fuchsin, resulting in easier penetration through the membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…114,115 Stacking in an offset eclipsed fashion can further reduce the equivalent pore size of COFs. 116 The pore wall is key since it sets chemical basis for the realization of functions and determines local microenvironment and interface for interactions with ions and molecules. 36 The chemistry of pore walls can be designed by choosing monomers with corresponding functional groups or postsynthetic modification on a pre-established network.…”
Section: Materials Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%