2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoindentation size effect in single-crystal nanoparticles and thin films: A comparative experimental and simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Mendelev EAM potential, the parameter a = 0.33r c was found to reproduce the value for the interface energy Fe/Sapphire. A similar approach was adapted for FCC nanoparticles and for further information on how to adjust the potential at the interface, we refer reader to [12]. To summarize, the nanoparticle shape, based upon the relaxed surface energies and the interface energy, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Choice Of Interatomic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the Mendelev EAM potential, the parameter a = 0.33r c was found to reproduce the value for the interface energy Fe/Sapphire. A similar approach was adapted for FCC nanoparticles and for further information on how to adjust the potential at the interface, we refer reader to [12]. To summarize, the nanoparticle shape, based upon the relaxed surface energies and the interface energy, is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Choice Of Interatomic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the indentation force measured during indentation of Au nanoparticles depends strongly on their size and all nanoparticles are softer than thin-films of the same height [12]. It is suggested that dislocations are nucleated beneath the tip, but due to the small lateral dimensions of the specimen, they instantly depin themselves and deplete on the lateral free surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations