2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (Nal-IRI)-based chemotherapy after irinotecan -based chemotherapy in patients with pancreas cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, in a previous study on the efficacy of nal-IRI/FF [ 11 ], patients who experienced no cancer progression with irinotecan treatment showed improved survival compared to those with prior cancer progression with irinotecan (mOS: 7.7 vs. 3.9 months). Smith et al [ 13 ] and Yu et al [ 14 ] showed a similar result in patients with APC who had been treated with irinotecan. Thus, we excluded patients who had received prior irinotecan-containing therapy to assess the effect of nal-IRI/FF without being confounded by the history of irinotecan administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Second, in a previous study on the efficacy of nal-IRI/FF [ 11 ], patients who experienced no cancer progression with irinotecan treatment showed improved survival compared to those with prior cancer progression with irinotecan (mOS: 7.7 vs. 3.9 months). Smith et al [ 13 ] and Yu et al [ 14 ] showed a similar result in patients with APC who had been treated with irinotecan. Thus, we excluded patients who had received prior irinotecan-containing therapy to assess the effect of nal-IRI/FF without being confounded by the history of irinotecan administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further retrospective analysis of OS rates under nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV after gemcitabine show a range from 4.4 to 9.4 months (15)(16)(17)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)25). Interestingly, the median PFS reported in the same retrospective studies shows a relatively narrow range of 2.0 to 4.1 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Glassman et al and Smith et al took a closer look when they analyzed OS of patients who progressed under non-liposomal irinotecan compared to patients without progression under non-liposomal irinotecan. Both reported significantly shorter OS in patients with tumor progress (Glassman: 3.9 vs. 9.0 months, P=0.035; Smith: 4.3 vs. 6.1 months, P<0.001) (20,23). Conversely, Kasi et al demonstrated in their retrospective analysis no survival difference between these two groups, thus matching our findings (non-liposomal naïve vs. pre-exposed: 10.3 vs. 9.3 months) (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations