2019
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201900253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomaterials in Proteomics

Abstract: For a deep understanding of the human proteome, the first crucial step is always the effective separation of targeted proteins/peptides from complex samples. In mass spectrometry‐based proteomics, nanomaterials have emerged as a highly effective means to separate targeted proteins/peptides and increase their relative abundance, which is beneficial to conduct mass spectrometric analysis. In particular, nanomaterials with different specific functionalities have received great attention in ordinary proteomics, ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 279 publications
(223 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesoporous NPs, due to the adjustable pore size and large specific surface area, have been explored in size-based separation and membrane proteomics 12 , 13 . From the technical point of view of material science, several recent review articles have summarized the manufacturing of NPs and their applications in biomedical science 14 . In this review, we intend to fill the gap from a proteomics perspective by focusing on the most pressing challenges currently facing MS-based proteomics (Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesoporous NPs, due to the adjustable pore size and large specific surface area, have been explored in size-based separation and membrane proteomics 12 , 13 . From the technical point of view of material science, several recent review articles have summarized the manufacturing of NPs and their applications in biomedical science 14 . In this review, we intend to fill the gap from a proteomics perspective by focusing on the most pressing challenges currently facing MS-based proteomics (Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the blooming development of materials in recent years, many emerging nanoporous materials have been tried for biomolecule separation, including superficially nanoporous silica microparticles, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), 2D materials, metal organic frameworks (MOFs), self-assembled block copolymers, covalent organic frameworks (COFs), functional hydrogels, heterostructured nanoporous microparticles, and nanofractal microparticles (Figure 2). Although several recent reviews have focused on the development of separation materials for specialized biomolecules, [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] it is necessary to review the state-of-the-art nanoporous materials for biomolecule separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important post-translational modification, protein glycosylation is involved in a range of biological processes [1], such as host-pathogen interaction and signal transduction [2][3][4], and abnormal glycosylation is usually significantly related to diseases like cancer [5][6][7]. Therefore, in-depth study of glycosylation will help to further understand the sites of action of glycosylation and find new disease-related biomarkers, providing the research direction with broad application prospects in the fields of clinical medicine and biochemistry [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, boric acid chemistry [16], hydrazine chemistry, lectin affinity method [17], and hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) [18,19] have become the main enrichment methods for glycopeptides. Among them, HILIC has been extensively applied in the separation and enrichment of glycopeptides [20,21], and many HILICbased materials, including metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [22] and graphene oxide [23], have been explored to capture glycopeptides [24,25]. Although a certain degree of performance has been achieved, HILIC-based nanomaterials also have the limitation of insufficient hydrophilicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%