2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26086g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanical mapping of a high curvature polymer brush grafted from a rigid nanoparticle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This set-up enables simultaneous mapping of both topography and sample nanomechanical properties in liquid. [31][32][33] In the PeakForce ® measurement, the scanner oscillates at a low frequency (1-3 kHz), resulting in a tip-sample interaction with every cycle. The maximum force on the tip is predetermined and maintained by a feed-back loop during the scan, which provides the opportunity for non-destructive imaging.…”
Section: Microgel Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This set-up enables simultaneous mapping of both topography and sample nanomechanical properties in liquid. [31][32][33] In the PeakForce ® measurement, the scanner oscillates at a low frequency (1-3 kHz), resulting in a tip-sample interaction with every cycle. The maximum force on the tip is predetermined and maintained by a feed-back loop during the scan, which provides the opportunity for non-destructive imaging.…”
Section: Microgel Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[89] AFM analysis AFM is complementary to TEM, as it yields the topography of the sample. [90] It is preferable to SEM in this case, because the resolving power is higher and the samples can be measured without pretreatment. [91] Since it was impossible to use the TEM specimens for the AFM measurements as well, new specimens were prepared by spin-coating the nanohybrids on glass disks from solution in methanol.…”
Section: Grafting Of Polymers With Single Trithiocarbonate Groups To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PeakForce Ò , the sample surface is moved towards the tip, in contrast to conventional tapping mode AFM. This technique is explained in detail in other publications [13,14,20,21]. Briefly, the surface is moved in a sinusoidal manner with the amplitude of approximately 150 nm at a frequency in the range 1-2 kHz.…”
Section: In-situ Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%