2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanics of free form and water submerged single layer graphene sheet under axial tension by using molecular dynamics simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been some disagreement between literature sources as to which loading direction of the graphene sheet is stronger, in our simulations we find that the ZZ direction is stronger and slightly stiffer than a graphene sheet loaded from the AC direction. This anisotropic dependance agrees with [12,13,15] which we attribute to the geometrical distribution of the covalent bonds in the hexagonal lattice, as illustrated in Figure 3(b) and (c). When graphene is loaded along the AC direction, roughly a third of the bonds in the sheet are perfectly aligned to the loading direction (Figure 3(b)), and thus the loading is directly transferred to these bonds.…”
Section: Sheet Size Dependencesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While there has been some disagreement between literature sources as to which loading direction of the graphene sheet is stronger, in our simulations we find that the ZZ direction is stronger and slightly stiffer than a graphene sheet loaded from the AC direction. This anisotropic dependance agrees with [12,13,15] which we attribute to the geometrical distribution of the covalent bonds in the hexagonal lattice, as illustrated in Figure 3(b) and (c). When graphene is loaded along the AC direction, roughly a third of the bonds in the sheet are perfectly aligned to the loading direction (Figure 3(b)), and thus the loading is directly transferred to these bonds.…”
Section: Sheet Size Dependencesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…With the AIREBO potential, Zhao et al [12] measured the elastic modulus of graphene to be 1.01 ± 0.01 TPa, the fracture stress 90 and 107 GPa, and the fracture strain 0.13 and 0.20 in the AC and ZZ direction, respectively. The relationships between the elastic and fracture properties with sheet size and temperature were also investigated in some literature sources [12][13][14] using these potentials, but some disagreement is found as to how the mechanical properties change with the length or aspect ratio of a graphene nanoribbon. For example, Wong et al [13] report a decrease in fracture stress and an increase in fracture strain with an increase in aspect ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The interatomic interactions of carbon atoms in SWCNT are described using the Adaptive Intermolecular Reactive Empirical Bond Order (AIREBO) potential [19]. The AIREBO potential is able to accurately describe the properties of solid-state and molecular carbon nanostructures [20,21] while maintaining the accuracies of the ab initio and semi-empirical methods in simulating large systems [22]. The torsional interaction due to dihedral angles in the system is also implemented in addition to the long range interactions in the AIREBO potential.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%