2023
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NanoPack2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data

Abstract: Summary Increases in the cohort size in long-read sequencing projects necessitate more efficient software for quality assessment and processing of sequencing data from Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Pacific Biosciences. Here we describe novel tools for summarizing experiments, filtering datasets, visualizing phased alignments results, and updates to the NanoPack software suite. Availability and implementation The cramino, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequencing adaptors were simultaneously removed by specifying the “--trim_adapters” flag. The results of each Guppy run were summarized using NanoPlot v. 1.40.2 (De Coster & Rademakers, 2023). Fastq files that passed basecalling were input to Mash v. 2.2.2 (Ondov et al, 2016) to confirm there was no significant contamination in the read-level data prior to assembly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing adaptors were simultaneously removed by specifying the “--trim_adapters” flag. The results of each Guppy run were summarized using NanoPlot v. 1.40.2 (De Coster & Rademakers, 2023). Fastq files that passed basecalling were input to Mash v. 2.2.2 (Ondov et al, 2016) to confirm there was no significant contamination in the read-level data prior to assembly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-read sequence quality control was performed with NanoPlot v1.41.6 [62]. Raw sequences were trimmed with NanoFilt v2.8.0 [62], with parameters -q 10 -l 300 for quality and read length, respectively. Assembly was performed using Flye v2.9.2 [63] with two approaches, (i) using default genome mode for flye (flye --nano-raw reads) and (ii) metagenome mode (flye –meta –nano-raw reads).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FastQ reads were quality assessed using FastQC (version 0.11.9) [7] and trimmed using FastP (version 0.20.1) [8] for Illumina or using Chopper (version 0.5.0) [9] for Oxford Nanopore outputs. De novo genome assemblies were generated using SPAdes (version 3.12.0) [10] for short reads and genome assembly for long reads was carried out using Flye (version 2.9.2) [11] obtaining 37 and one contig, respectively, with an average G+C content of 66.1 mol%.…”
Section: Data Processing Annotation and Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%