2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle-based biosensors for detection of pathogenic bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
118
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications range from fields such as human and animal health (Ivnitski et al, 1999;Lazcka et al, 2007;Luppa et al, 2011;Sanvicens et al, 2009;Schmitt and Henderson, 2005;Tothill, 2001;Wilson and Gifford, 2005), food safety (Amine et al, 2006;Arora et al, 2011;Ivnitski et al, 2000;Leonard et al, 2003;Mello and Kubota, 2002;O'Kennedy et al, 2005;Patel, 2002;Van Dorst et al, 2010;Velusamy et al, 2010), environmental monitoring, including biological threat agents detection (Amine et al, 2006;Iqbal et al, 2000;Rodriguez-Mozaz et al, 2004Rogers, 1995;Rogers and Gerlach, 1999;Van Dorst et al, 2010;Velasco-Garcia and Mottram, 2003) to analysis of drinking water quality (Leonard et al, 2003;Mello and Kubota, 2002;Noble and Weisberg, 2005;O'Kennedy et al, 2005). Among the large number of existing biosensor types, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications range from fields such as human and animal health (Ivnitski et al, 1999;Lazcka et al, 2007;Luppa et al, 2011;Sanvicens et al, 2009;Schmitt and Henderson, 2005;Tothill, 2001;Wilson and Gifford, 2005), food safety (Amine et al, 2006;Arora et al, 2011;Ivnitski et al, 2000;Leonard et al, 2003;Mello and Kubota, 2002;O'Kennedy et al, 2005;Patel, 2002;Van Dorst et al, 2010;Velusamy et al, 2010), environmental monitoring, including biological threat agents detection (Amine et al, 2006;Iqbal et al, 2000;Rodriguez-Mozaz et al, 2004Rogers, 1995;Rogers and Gerlach, 1999;Van Dorst et al, 2010;Velasco-Garcia and Mottram, 2003) to analysis of drinking water quality (Leonard et al, 2003;Mello and Kubota, 2002;Noble and Weisberg, 2005;O'Kennedy et al, 2005). Among the large number of existing biosensor types, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their implementation in bioanalytical assays enhanced assay performance, opened new possibilities for devices miniaturization and allowed the development of entirely new assay formats. In particular, nanomaterials have generated great expectations with respect to increasing assay detectability and selectivity and reducing assay times [72][73][74][75][76] and to enhance analytical performance in a variety of analytical applications, such as microfluidic platforms [77], electrochemical [78], optical [79], and microgravimetry [80] biosensors, thus potentially providing significant advancements for multipathogen detection.…”
Section: Nanotechnologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is already known that these unique types of nanostructured matter have many advantages such as increased ratio surface/volume, controllable size, enhanced magnetic properties and they are easy to immobilize to an electrode surface by applying a magnetic field. Thus, various types of nanostructures have been engineered in order to detect specific targets, including bacteria [5][6][7][8][9]. For example, Koets et al, 2009 [10] developed a magneto-resistant sensor using superparamagnetic particles as labels for the detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%