2006
DOI: 10.1366/000370206778664671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle Mass Spectrometry: Pushing the Limit of Single Particle Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method becomes less effective as the particle size increases because the particle kinetic energy grows too large to handle with electrostatics or electrodynamic alone. 103 Instead, a so-called aerodynamic lens (ADL) developed by McMurry et al, 155 tends to be more effective for particles at the higher end of the nanometre size range. Generally, ADL consists of a 100 mm flow limiting orifice attached to a 1 cm inner diameter, 30 cm long tube.…”
Section: On-line Bulk Sampling and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method becomes less effective as the particle size increases because the particle kinetic energy grows too large to handle with electrostatics or electrodynamic alone. 103 Instead, a so-called aerodynamic lens (ADL) developed by McMurry et al, 155 tends to be more effective for particles at the higher end of the nanometre size range. Generally, ADL consists of a 100 mm flow limiting orifice attached to a 1 cm inner diameter, 30 cm long tube.…”
Section: On-line Bulk Sampling and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several operationally defined particle sizes are used in atmospheric science ( Johnston et al 2006), and it is not generally obvious which agrees best with the diameters measured in microscopes. Images are usually two-dimensional (2D) projections, so information on the third dimension of the particle is lost.…”
Section: Size and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of mass spectrometers using various particle vaporization and ionization techniques have been developed. The most common designs include thermal desorption followed by electron ionization [24, 25] or other types of ionization [26, 27] and laser ablation [28, 29]. Instruments based on thermal desorption are mainly configured for determining ensemble particle properties averaged over defined time periods, whereas the laser-based instruments are primarily used for single-particle measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%