Nanofabrication Towards Biomedical Applications 2005
DOI: 10.1002/3527603476.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticles for Cancer Drug Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(174 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the formulations, nP1 and nP2 had the average hydrodynamic size of around 100 nm (figure 6). The expansion in the size of the nanoparticles obtained by DLS compared to FeSEM method can be accounted by the hydrophilic interaction of PVP molecules as similarly reported elsewhere [31]. The nP1 and nP2 formulations were stable with the zeta potential of −20.9 and −24.1 mV, respectively.…”
Section: Nanoformulationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the formulations, nP1 and nP2 had the average hydrodynamic size of around 100 nm (figure 6). The expansion in the size of the nanoparticles obtained by DLS compared to FeSEM method can be accounted by the hydrophilic interaction of PVP molecules as similarly reported elsewhere [31]. The nP1 and nP2 formulations were stable with the zeta potential of −20.9 and −24.1 mV, respectively.…”
Section: Nanoformulationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies have shown size-dependent tumor-specific delivery of nano- particles to the tumor microvasculator through the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect. 41,42 We found that increasing the size of the nanoparticle from d ) 90 ( 10 nm to d ) 350 ( 50 nm resulted in enhanced preferential cytotoxicity for tumor versus nontumor ovarian cells. Although our initial studies were done in Vitro, with evaluation of only two normal immortalized cell lines and their transformed isogenic counterparts, we believe that these observations are quite significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, nanomaterials have effectively been employed to deliver biologically active cargo into living systems for the purposes of disease diagnosis and therapy. , Among diverse classes of nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have attracted particular attention as carriers of biologically relevant molecules due to their unique physical, chemical, and physiological properties. It has been shown, for example, that CNTs can serve as a highly efficient vehicle to transport a wide range of molecules across membranes into living cells. In addition, the intrinsic stability and structural flexibility of CNTs may prolong the circulation time as well as the bioavailability of drug molecules conjugated to CNTs. Radiolabeled functionalized SWNTs ( f -SWNTs) have been found to exhibit a blood circulation half-life of 1−3 h, depending on the radiolabels used. , For instance, [ 111 In]- f -SWNTs exhibited a slightly longer blood circulation half-life as compared with [ 86 Y]- f -SWNTs . When SWNTs were noncovalently wrapped with a linear poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chain, the blood circulation time of the PEG-SWNT was prolonged with increasing molecular weight of the PEG chain, e.g., from 1.2 h for 2 kDa PEG-wrapped SWNTs to 5 h for 5 kDa PEG-wrapped SWNTs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%