Practical Aspects of Chemical Engineering 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39867-5_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticles Size Determination by Dynamic Light Scattering in Real (Non-standard) Conditions Regulators - Design, Tests and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, based on the principles of the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method used herein and apparatus limitations, we chose to round droplet size numbers up to a full number. Moreover, based on previous experience from studies with different high-PDI systems [ 35 ], we considered droplet/particle size by intensity and number. Detailed studies of droplet size distributions clearly showed that even a small fraction of larger particles/droplets or accidental contaminations impacted the Z-ave and size distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, based on the principles of the dynamic light scattering (DLS) method used herein and apparatus limitations, we chose to round droplet size numbers up to a full number. Moreover, based on previous experience from studies with different high-PDI systems [ 35 ], we considered droplet/particle size by intensity and number. Detailed studies of droplet size distributions clearly showed that even a small fraction of larger particles/droplets or accidental contaminations impacted the Z-ave and size distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 24 h from the time of homogenization, all samples showed homogeneity, completely constituting the emulsion layer. Hence, EI24h (emulsification index determined after 24 h) can be taken as 100% for all samples, except the sample without saponins, Based on our previous experience [10,41], we decided to present droplet size distribution by intensity, number and volume ratio ( Figure 3). In our previous work [10] we suggested that during the DLS results analysis, the intensity of scattered light by particles should be considered for nanoparticles or droplet size characterization.…”
Section: Emulsion Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, EI24h (emulsification index determined after 24 h) can be taken as 100% for all samples, except the sample without saponins, Based on our previous experience [10,41], we decided to present droplet size distribution by intensity, number and volume ratio ( Figure 3). In our previous work [10] we suggested that during the DLS results analysis, the intensity of scattered light by particles should be considered for nanoparticles or droplet size characterization. One of the reasons for this is that the presence of even a few large particles (possible contaminations or samples with high PDI index) strongly affects the average particle's diameter.…”
Section: Emulsion Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same material with crystalline phases, the diffraction pattern is also different. Therefore, by studying the angle at which the XRD peaks are formed ( Figure 1 b) and the relative intensity of each peak, the type of materials and their phase can be qualitatively identified; amorphous materials do not form specific peaks, while crystalline materials that have a regular structure create specific peaks at certain angles Jarzebski et al [ 26 ] suggested that for the DLS analysis, the intensity of scattered light by particles is of utmost importance for nanoemulsion characterization. The reason could be due to the presence of some large particles that strongly affect the average particle’s diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%