2020
DOI: 10.1111/maps.13537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanophase iron carbides in fine‐grained rims in CM2 carbonaceous chondrites: Formation of organic material by Fischer–Tropsch catalysis in the solar nebula

Abstract: Transmission electron microscope studies of fine‐grained rims in three CM2 carbonaceous chondrites, Y‐791198, Murchison, and ALH 81002, have revealed the presence of widespread nanoparticles with a distinctive core–shell structure, invariably associated with carbonaceous material. These nanoparticles vary in size from ~20 nm up to 50 nm in diameter and consist of a core of Fe,Ni carbide surrounded by a continuous layer of polycrystalline magnetite. These magnetite shells are 5–7 nm in thickness irrespective of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FGRs are characteristic features of CM2 (Brearley, 2021; Hua et al., 2002; Huss et al., 2005; Lauretta et al., 2000; Metzler et al., 1992; Zega & Buseck, 2003; Zolensky et al., 1993) and some CO3 chondrites (Brearley, 1993; Brearley et al., 1995; Haenecour et al., 2018). The rims may have formed and accreted onto the chondrules in the solar nebula (Brearley, 1993; Chizmadia & Brearley, 2008; Ciesla et al., 2003; Hua et al., 1996; Metzler et al., 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGRs are characteristic features of CM2 (Brearley, 2021; Hua et al., 2002; Huss et al., 2005; Lauretta et al., 2000; Metzler et al., 1992; Zega & Buseck, 2003; Zolensky et al., 1993) and some CO3 chondrites (Brearley, 1993; Brearley et al., 1995; Haenecour et al., 2018). The rims may have formed and accreted onto the chondrules in the solar nebula (Brearley, 1993; Chizmadia & Brearley, 2008; Ciesla et al., 2003; Hua et al., 1996; Metzler et al., 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix of lithology D is distinct as it also contains partially altered metal grains. However, it should be noted that it is possible these metal grains could be carbides due to the challenges associated with detecting carbon by EDS (Brearley, 2021). Similarly, the matrix of lithology G is distinct as it contains several fragments of anhydrous silicates.…”
Section: Matrix Petrologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second hypothesis is that FGRs formed via various parent body processes, such as aqueous alteration and compaction via impact processing (e.g., McSween Jr, 1987;Sears et al, 1993;Trigo-Rodriguez et al, 2006;Takayama & Tomeoka, 2012). Evidence provided to support parent body formation includes the observations that: (1) FGRs are more Mg-rich in more altered chondrites, similar to the progressive enrichment of Mg seen in the matrices of chondrites during parent body aqueous alteration (Brearley et al, 1999;McSween Jr, 1987); (2) FGRs appear to compositionally match the matrix and thus likely formed from material that was previously part of the matrix (Takayama & Tomeoka, 2012); and (3) FGR porosity may be explained by aqueous alteration following impact compaction (Trigo-Rodriguez et al, 2006). Multiple types of FGRs have been identified and characterized based on their compositions and were proposed to have potentially formed by separate processes (Leitner et al, 2016;Takayama & Tomeoka, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CM chondrites contain ~20 vol% chondrules, ~70 vol% interchondrule matrix that often hosts many alteration products, and ~10% refractory inclusions and opaque minerals (e.g., Weisberg et al., 2006). Chondrules in the CM chondrites are commonly encircled by fine‐grained material called fine‐grained rims (FGRs), sometimes termed “accretionary dust mantles” or “fine‐grained chondrule rims” (e.g., Brearley et al., 1999; Hanna & Ketcham, 2018; Metzler et al., 1992). We will henceforth use the term FGR as it is descriptive and does not imply a specific formation environment or mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%