Nanopore Structure Analysis and Permeability Predictions for a Tight Gas/Shale Reservoir Using Low-Pressure Adsorption and Mercury Intrusion Techniques

Abstract

The pore structure of unconventional gas reservoirs, despite having a significant impact on hydrocarbon storage and transport, has historically been difficult to characterize due to a wide pore size distribution, with a significant pore volume in the nanopore range. A variety of methods are typically required to characterize the full pore spectrum, with each individual technique limited to a certain pore size range. In this work, we investigate the use of non-destructive, low-pressure adsorption methods, in particular low pressure N2 adsorption analysis, to infer pore shape, and to determine pore size distributions of a tight gas/shale reservoir in Western Canada. Unlike previous studies, core plug samples, not crushed samples, are used for isotherm analysis, allowing an undisturbed pore structure to be analyzed. Further, the core plugs used for isotherm analysis are subsamples (end pieces) of cores for which MICP and permeability measurements were previously made, allowing a more direct comparison with these techniques. Pore size distributions determined from two isotherm interpretation methods (BJH Theory and Density Functional Theory), are in reasonable agreement with MICP, for that portion of the pore size distribution sampled by both. The pore geometry is interpreted to be slit-shaped, as inferred from isotherm hysteresis loop shape, the agreement between adsorption- and MICP-derived dominant pore sizes, SEM imaging and the character of measured permeability stress-dependence. Although correlations between inorganic composition and total organic carbon (TOC) and dominant pore throat size and permeability are weak, the sample with the lowest illite clay and TOC content has the largest dominant pore throat size and highest permeability, as estimated from MICP. The presence of stress-relief-induced microfractures, however, appears to affect lab-derived (pressure-decay and pulse-decay) estimates of permeability, even after application of confining pressure. Based on the premise of slit-shaped pore geometry, fractured rock models (matchstick and cube) were used to predict absolute permeability, using dominant pore throat size from MICP/adsorption analysis and porosity measured under confining pressure. The predictions are reasonable, although permeability is mostly over-predicted for samples that are unaffected by stress-release fractures. The conceptual model used to justify the application of these models is slot pores at grain boundaries.

Pore Characterization and Inner Adsorption Mechanism Investigation for Methane in Organic and Inorganic Matters of Shale

“…The pore size distributions illustrate that the shale pore mainly consists of micropores and mesopores. 2,11,14 As the crucial parameters of pore structure, the SSA and pore volume (PV) are dominated by micropores. 2,14 The organic matter was believed to be the major contributor to micropores, 2,4,5,14 while the inorganic matter (e.g., clay 2,4,17,41 and silica 40 ) is the major contributor to nonmicropores (mesopores and macropores).…”

Frontier Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research on the Application of Imbibition Techniques in High-Pressure Forced Soaking of Hydraulically Fractured Shale Oil Reservoirs

“…The pore structure of shale was observed by atomic force microscope, and later research found that the pore diameter of shale oil is 30~400 nm. Loucks et al [27,28] used scanning electron microscopy to find that the pores of shale gas reservoirs are mainly micropores and nanopores. The nanopores are mainly distributed in organic pores, with a small amount dispersed in an inorganic matrix composed of pyrite.…”

Water Distribution in the Montney Tight Gas Play of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin: Significance for Resource Evaluation

“…At the formation scale the Montney is relatively homogeneous and has restricted ranges of grain size (virtually all siltstone), pore size and pore throat size (Clarkson et al 2012). The strong correlation of resistivity and bulk volume water is therefore attributed to electrical conductivity in the Montney tight gas fairway being primarily a response to the volume of hypersaline water in the formation.…”