2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3727618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale 3D EM Reconstructions Reveal Intrinsic Mechanisms of Structural Diversity of Chemical Synapses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appearance of SP clusters likely reflects the elaboration and the stabilization of the spine apparatus (Perez‐Alvarez et al , 2020), that is, together with the presence of polyribosomes, predictive of activity‐dependent spine enlargement (Chirillo et al , 2019). In agreement with our results, a recent electron microscopy study performed in the intact hippocampus revealed that mushroom spines but not smaller protrusions (e.g., thin, stubby, or filopodial) exhibit higher volume and PSD size when contacted by TetTx + presynaptic terminals and more likely contained a spine apparatus (Zhu et al , 2021). The input‐specificity of SP recruitment upon activity perturbation is also supported by previous reports showing that high‐frequency stimulation in the dentate gyrus enhances SP immunoreactivity selectively in the corresponding stimulated layers (Yamazaki et al , 2008; de Solis et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The appearance of SP clusters likely reflects the elaboration and the stabilization of the spine apparatus (Perez‐Alvarez et al , 2020), that is, together with the presence of polyribosomes, predictive of activity‐dependent spine enlargement (Chirillo et al , 2019). In agreement with our results, a recent electron microscopy study performed in the intact hippocampus revealed that mushroom spines but not smaller protrusions (e.g., thin, stubby, or filopodial) exhibit higher volume and PSD size when contacted by TetTx + presynaptic terminals and more likely contained a spine apparatus (Zhu et al , 2021). The input‐specificity of SP recruitment upon activity perturbation is also supported by previous reports showing that high‐frequency stimulation in the dentate gyrus enhances SP immunoreactivity selectively in the corresponding stimulated layers (Yamazaki et al , 2008; de Solis et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In agreement with our results, a recent electron microscopy study performed in the intact hippocampus revealed that mushroom spines but not smaller protrusions (e.g. thin, stubby or filopodial) exhibit higher volume and PSD size when contacted by TetTx+ presynaptic terminals and more likely contained a spine apparatus (Zhu et al, 2021). The input-specificity of SP recruitment upon activity perturbation is also supported by previous reports showing that high-frequency stimulation in the dentate gyrus enhances SP immunoreactivity selectively in the corresponding stimulated layers (de Solis et al, 2017;Yamazaki et al, 2008).…”
Section: Sp As a Molecular Tag To Promote Input-specific Synaptic Plasticitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…1A) 2,3 . The combined presence of these features allows for highly contextualized analysis of cellular-level neuronal connectivity, and for various organisms, this approach has led to new insights into topics like cell-type-specific nervous system connectivity ; development-or learning-mediated changes in neural circuitry [31][32][33][34] ; and the fine structure of neuronal and non-neuronal cells [35][36][37][38][39][40] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%