2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr04983k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale electric polarizability of ultrathin biolayers on insulating substrates by electrostatic force microscopy

Abstract: We measured and quantified the local electric polarization properties of ultrathin (∼5 nm) biolayers on mm-thick mica substrates. We achieved it by scanning a sharp conductive tip (<10 nm radius) of an electrostatic force microscope over the biolayers and quantifying sub-picoNewton electric polarization forces with a sharp-tip model implemented using finite-element numerical calculations. We obtained relative dielectric constants εr = 3.3, 2.4 and 1.9 for bacteriorhodopsin, dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of lift mode imaging ensures the maximum sensitivity in all positions of the sample, and our analysis ensures the results are free from topographic crosstalk artefacts. We would like to highlight, however, that for planar samples or low dimensional non-planar samples (like nanoparticles, nanotubes, etc,) the use of constant height imaging mode can be preferred since the accuracy required (very often in the sub-1zF/nm) [26,27,29] cannot be offered by the reconstruction procedure presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of lift mode imaging ensures the maximum sensitivity in all positions of the sample, and our analysis ensures the results are free from topographic crosstalk artefacts. We would like to highlight, however, that for planar samples or low dimensional non-planar samples (like nanoparticles, nanotubes, etc,) the use of constant height imaging mode can be preferred since the accuracy required (very often in the sub-1zF/nm) [26,27,29] cannot be offered by the reconstruction procedure presented here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason being that for metallic substrates the cantilever contribution is included in both the lift EFM image and the reconstructed crosstalk image, and hence it is automatically subtracted and does not contribute to the intrinsic capacitance gradient image. Note, however, that in the case of thick insulator substrates, the microscopic parts of the probe, such as the cantilever, induce some indirect effects in addition to the direct stray effect mentioned above, and some contribution from them need to be included in the model [29,35].…”
Section: Quantitative Analysis Of Intrinsic Capacitance Gradient Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that EFM measurements are more sensitive to the hygroscopic properties than the AFM images themselves, as it can be seen by comparing the relative variations produced by a RH change on the electric signals ( Figure 1l) and on the topographic profiles ( Figure 1d). The reason being that the electric permittivity of water (ε r,water~8 0) is much larger than that of the dry biochemical components of the endospore (ε r,proteins ~3-5 for proteins, 48,49 ε r,lipids~2 for lipids 48 and ε r,DNA~8…”
Section: -32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFM is a scanning probe microscopy technique sensitive to the local dielectric properties of the samples. 33,34 Examples showing this ability include numerous applications to samples of non-biological origin (thin and thick oxides, 35 polymer films, [36][37][38] nanowires, 39 nanotubes 40,41 or nanoparticles [42][43][44][45] ), and of biological origin (single bacterial cells, 46,47 single virus particles, 45 solid supported biomembranes, 48 protein complexes 49 or DNA molecules). 50 EFM has two important properties relevant for the present application, namely, (i)…”
Section: -32mentioning
confidence: 99%