Fluid
distributions throughout oilfield reservoirs have been measured
with increasing accuracy and coverage, both vertical and laterally,
in recent years. Currently, a routine observation is that, when reservoir
crude oils are in thermodynamic equilibrium, then the reservoir is
a single flow unit with fluid flow communication, addressing the most
important oil production risk associated with reservoir structure.
The most accurate method of determining fluid equilibration is by
measurement and analysis of the distribution of dissolved (or suspended)
asphaltenes in the oil. This analysis employs the Flory–Huggins–Zuo
equation of state (EoS) with its reliance on the Yen–Mullins
model of asphaltene nanostructures. This capability has enabled the
introduction of a new technical discipline, reservoir fluid geodynamics,
which provides a significant advance in the understanding of oilfield
reservoirs. Other reservoir fluid components are also measured to
assess equilibration of reservoir fluids, including dissolved gas,
liquid-phase components, various biomarkers, and methane isotopic
ratios. Often, there is a single species of asphaltenes in the reservoir
in accordance with the Yen–Mullins model (molecules, nanoaggregates,
and clusters). However, for some reservoirs, two species of asphaltenes
are evident. These reservoirs provide a stringent test to (1) discern
nanostructures of asphaltenes and (2) determine whether there are
other prominent aggregate species of asphaltenes in addition to those
indicated in the Yen–Mullins model. This paper explores five
reservoirs: three of these reservoirs exhibit one dominant species;
two exhibit two species of the Yen–Mullins model; and none
of the reservoirs exhibits additional species, providing validation
of asphaltene nanostructures in the Yen–Mullins model and its
application with the Flory–Huggins–Zuo EoS for novel
characterization of reservoirs.