the major tool in this context. Even though homovalent dopants can be beneficial, it is usually heterovalent doping, which is most effective in generating charge carriers. Introducing an effectively negatively charged dopant (such as replacing a cation by a lower-valent one) will-apart from rather exotic cases-increase the concentration of all effectively positively charged point defects (cation interstitials, anion vacancies, and electron holes) and decrease the concentration of all negatively charged point defects (cation vacancies, anion interstitials, and excess electrons) as long as they are in mutual equilibrium. [1] Introducing effectively positively charged defects (e.g., higher-valent cationic substitution) will have the opposite effect. To predict to what degree this occurs, whether, e.g., the dopant concentrations are primarily ionically or electronically compensated, is a matter of defect chemistry. For the sake of precision, the homogeneous introduction of effectively charged foreign elements in the form of point defects will be termed 0D doping in the following. Here, the impurities are usually distributed randomly, and compensating counter charges are locally trapped and/or free beyond the Bjerrum length, at which electrostatic and thermal energies are equal. While the trapped carrier may be potentially mobile around the dopant, i.e., within the trapping zone (see Figure 1a,b), longrange transport requires detrapping. Figure 1 illustrates doping mechanisms of ionic conductors of various dimensionalities. Higher-dimensional doping has recently been explored as alternative doping strategy, potentially overcoming, e.g., limited solubility and charge-carrier trapping issues associated with 0D doping. It has been the availability of sophisticated thin film preparation techniques, that lets higher-dimensional doping come to the fore. If, e.g., in an epitaxial film of a layered compound a complete cationic layer is-in an atomically sharp fashion-replaced by a layer with a heterovalent cation, the whole 2D defect will be charged and the counter charge is generated in the adjacent space-charge zones. One could also think of this 2D doping situation as a 2D arrangement of charged point defects (see Figure 1c). Such an ordering constitutes perfect percolation along the layer, but may also be more easily interrupted by, e.g., impurities or stacking faults. Even more easily interrupted is transport in a 1D doping scenario (1D ordering of point defects). Importantly, in the 0D doping case, the total number (volume integrated) of free charge carriers increases with distance to the dopants, because of the 3D distribution, Ionically conducting oxide heterostructures provide ideal geometries for revealing interfacial effects in solid state ionics. Beyond that, they can provide a high density of heterointerfaces and thus allow for reliable studies of interfacial phenomena with respect to fundamental understanding as well as with respect to nanoionic applications. Substituting an entire single layer rather than random...