2004
DOI: 10.1021/nl049758x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale Protein Patterning by Imprint Lithography

Abstract: Selective localization of active proteins to patterns or specific sites is important for development of biosensors, bioMEMS, tissue engineering, and basic proteomic research. We present a flexible technique for selectively patterning bioactive proteins with nanoscale resolution using nanoimprint lithography and fluoropolymer surface passivation, and exploiting the specificity of the biotin/streptavidin linkage. This technique achieves high throughput reproducible nanoscale protein patterns with high selectivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
219
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
219
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method can be modified slightly to accommodate these fabrication methods by derivatizing the glass surface after the fabrication of the wells to prevent the destruction of the biotin moieties during the imprinting or etching steps. [32][33][34] With the densities we have shown here, more than 20 million beads can be arrayed in 1 cm 2 . We have also demonstrated the ability to fabricate arrays of wells with dimensions as small as 0.8 μm and densities approaching 40 million wells/cm 2 over a large area on a cover glass with the stepper system we used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method can be modified slightly to accommodate these fabrication methods by derivatizing the glass surface after the fabrication of the wells to prevent the destruction of the biotin moieties during the imprinting or etching steps. [32][33][34] With the densities we have shown here, more than 20 million beads can be arrayed in 1 cm 2 . We have also demonstrated the ability to fabricate arrays of wells with dimensions as small as 0.8 μm and densities approaching 40 million wells/cm 2 over a large area on a cover glass with the stepper system we used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our method can be modified slightly to accommodate these fabrication methods by derivatizing the glass surface after the fabrication of the wells to prevent the destruction of the biotin moieties during the imprinting or etching steps. [32][33][34] Barbee and Huang Page 5…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using predominantly non-contact printers based on ink-jet technology, antibody microarrays have been produced and applied having an overall foot print of <1 cm 2 , based on 18 × 10 3 μm 2 (Ø ∼ 150 μm)-sized spots at a density of ⩽2000 spots cm −2 ; and a multiplicity of <850 different antibodies/array [5][6][7]13]. In an effort to evolve the array platform even further with respect to both spot density (>100 000 spots cm −2 ) and spot size (<0.8 μm 2 , Ø < 1 μm), the first conceptual antibody (protein) nanoarrays have been produced [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; for review see [24]. A set of technologies are available for producing such nanoarrays, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of technologies are available for producing such nanoarrays, e.g. atomic force microscopy (AFM) [25], dip-pen nanolithography (DPN) [26], nanofountain probe [27,28], nanoimprint lithography [16], and various nanodispensers [20,22,29]. Albeit successful, these nanoarray layouts have been found to be associated with a set of key methodological shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…monolayers (SAMs) 9,10 or adsorbed copolymers 8 which permit patterning of proteins in the sub-100 nm size range. Another imprint method that has shown utility in the patterning of functional materials is nanocontact molding (NCM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%