1978
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80824-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosecond fluorescence depolarization studies on actin labeled with 1,5‐IAEDANS and dansyl chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the calculation of R 0 , for the D-A pair considered in this study, the orientation factor k 2 was 2 / 3 (Förster, 1948;Van Der Meer et al, 1991) the value averaged over a fastreorienting and random distribution of label orientations. Discussions on the validity of this approximation, on the basis of substantial rapid reorientation of both donor and acceptor on the fluorescence timescale, have been presented: for Tm donor-labeled with AEDANS (Tao et al, 1983), for F-actin acceptor-labeled with DABMI at Cys-374 (Tao, 1978). The good agreement between the modeled and the measured interchain distances on Tm, presented in a previous work , is a further confirmation of the correctness of this approximation.…”
Section: Distance Distribution Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the calculation of R 0 , for the D-A pair considered in this study, the orientation factor k 2 was 2 / 3 (Förster, 1948;Van Der Meer et al, 1991) the value averaged over a fastreorienting and random distribution of label orientations. Discussions on the validity of this approximation, on the basis of substantial rapid reorientation of both donor and acceptor on the fluorescence timescale, have been presented: for Tm donor-labeled with AEDANS (Tao et al, 1983), for F-actin acceptor-labeled with DABMI at Cys-374 (Tao, 1978). The good agreement between the modeled and the measured interchain distances on Tm, presented in a previous work , is a further confirmation of the correctness of this approximation.…”
Section: Distance Distribution Model Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) was 2 ⁄3, the value averaged over a fast-reorienting and random distribution of label orientations. Discussions on the validity of this approximation, on the basis of substantial rapid reorientation of both donor and acceptor on the fluorescence time scale, have been presented: for Tm donor-labeled with AEDANS at Cys-190 (Tao et al, 1983), for F-actin acceptor-labeled with DABMI at Cys-374 (Tao, 1978), and for F-actin acceptor-labeled with TRITC-Ph (Heidecker et al, 1995). The good agreement between the modeled and the measured inter-chain distances on Tm, presented in the previous section, is a further confirmation of the correctness of this approximation.…”
Section: Orientation Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r 2 /N is then minimized using X, Y, and Z as variable parameters. Fluorescence anisotropy decay was measured according to methods described in Tao (1978). The anisotropy A(t) was calculated using the equation:…”
Section: Fluorescence Measurements and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%