2015
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2015.2408344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosecond-pulsed discharge plasma splitting of carbon dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy efficiency obtained with NSP by Bak et al . is also lower than in our case, at slightly lower conversion values.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The energy efficiency obtained with NSP by Bak et al . is also lower than in our case, at slightly lower conversion values.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Due to its increasing interest, many researchers are investigating the splitting of CO 2 into CO and O 2 by plasma, both in pure CO 2 as well as in a mixture with other gases like CH 4 , H 2 , or H 2 O . When CO 2 is mixed with such a hydrogen source, value‐added chemicals can be produced, such as syngas, methanol, formaldehyde and formic acid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, the plasma reactor has been identified as a commercially attractive alternative to chemical plants in the production of CO 2 neutral fuels due to their simplicity, compactness and low price 22 . A wide range of plasma technologies have been proposed for the dissociation of CO 2 23 , including Corona discharges 24,25,26 , nanosecond pulsed discharges 27 , micro hollow cathode discharges 28 , microplasmas 29 , dielectric barrier discharges 30,31,32,33 , gliding arcs 34,35 , and microwave plasmas 37,38 . Out of these vastly varying technologies, the microwave plasma and gliding arc have been operated with the highest power, in the kW range, and have shown the best efficiencies, 40% for a gliding arc and 60-80% for a microwave discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the 2017 Plasma Roadmap [1], 'process selectivity, conversion and/or energy efficiency are still not sufficient to justify the large-scale use of non-thermal plasmas' for many environmental applications. Examples of such applications include the conversion of CO 2 [2][3][4][5], the production of syngas or hydrogen [6][7][8][9], liquid fuels [10][11][12], ozone [13][14][15] or the removal of volatile organic compounds or other pollutants from air streams [16][17][18][19][20][21]. These applications usually involve the use of a plasma reactor where both desired and undesired reactions may take place during or following a non-equilibrium electric discharge, eventually with the help of a catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%