2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoseparations: Strategies for size and/or shape-selective purification of nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
208
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
208
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible techniques for size fractionation are gel electrophoresis, 17,18 exclusion chromatography, 19 reversed micelle preparation, 20 size-selective precipitation (SSP) [21][22][23] or flow-field fractionation (FFF). [24][25][26] Detailed summaries of techniques used for separation of nanoparticles by their size and/ or shape are provided in reviews by Kowalczyk 27 and Mori. 28 For CuInS 2 nanocrystals, a broad absorbance spectrum without a well pronounced peak but with a long tail to lower energies was observed by several groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible techniques for size fractionation are gel electrophoresis, 17,18 exclusion chromatography, 19 reversed micelle preparation, 20 size-selective precipitation (SSP) [21][22][23] or flow-field fractionation (FFF). [24][25][26] Detailed summaries of techniques used for separation of nanoparticles by their size and/ or shape are provided in reviews by Kowalczyk 27 and Mori. 28 For CuInS 2 nanocrystals, a broad absorbance spectrum without a well pronounced peak but with a long tail to lower energies was observed by several groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 However, in most cases, the particles need to be purified after synthesis. 25 Furthermore, in all those methods using a given set of experimental (e.g., reaction) conditions and parameters provide just a given average size and shape of particles. To obtain monodisperse particles of various sizes, the experimental conditions and parameters must be changed and the procedure should be repeated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation arises from (i) the significant difference in mass and electron density between organic ligand shells relative to inorganic nanoparticle cores, which complicates the use of many probes that rely on these principles, and (ii) an insufficiently narrow distribution of structural properties of both the ligand (e.g., number, length) and nanoparticle (e.g., size, shape) that prevents distinction between inhomogeneities via separations techniques (26).…”
Section: Ligands Arranged On Nanoparticle Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches to quantify nanoparticle structure can be broadly classified as ensemble techniques, which can evaluate the collective properties of a sample to provide population-level estimates of average structural parameters, or local techniques, which can directly probe the structure of individual nanoparticles. Because ensemble measurements cannot be deconvoluted without significant assumptions about structure and purity, but individual measurements can be built up into population-level statistics, the latter more quantitatively describes nanoparticle uniformity for heterogeneous populations (25)(26)(27). In particular, the automated, algorithmic analysis of electron microscopy (EM) images holds tremendous potential to improve the rigor of nanomaterial characterization.…”
Section: From Atoms To Crystalline Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%