1998
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.294-296.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosized Lead Inclusions in Aluminum-Magic Sizes and Aspect Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are similar to two phase lead-tin inclusions in aluminum produced by ion implantation. 4 Johnson et al 4 have reported the formation of two phase lead-tin particles attached along internal {111} fcc interface. Their results show that Pb has fcc structure and is oriented in parallel cube alignment with Al matrix, whereas the orientation of Sn has not been established.…”
Section: Bhattacharya and Chattopadhyaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are similar to two phase lead-tin inclusions in aluminum produced by ion implantation. 4 Johnson et al 4 have reported the formation of two phase lead-tin particles attached along internal {111} fcc interface. Their results show that Pb has fcc structure and is oriented in parallel cube alignment with Al matrix, whereas the orientation of Sn has not been established.…”
Section: Bhattacharya and Chattopadhyaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all inclusions are parallel to the matrix lattice but isolated from each other by the limited solid solubility, the Al matrix acts as an alignment field and an isolating medium. In the nanoscale size regime, solid Pb inclusions display magic size behavior [3], and their equilibrium shape is affected by the edge energy of the faceted shapes [4]. Solid inclusions at grain boundaries were found to adopt compound shapes that depend on the crystallographic characteristics of the grain boundary [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previously considered case of facetted Pb nanoparticles that are embedded in an Al matrix with a cube‐on‐cube orientation relationship obeyed, two additional contributions to the interface energy were considered: a residual strain energy which gives rise to a “magic size effect,” and a term considering the contribution of the edge energy of the faceted shape, which renders the aspect ratio ρ size dependent. [ 31,43,89 ] It should, however, be considered that the total excess strain energy stored in these Al–Pb interfaces is based on misfit‐dislocations that reduce the total residual (misfit) strain. [ 90 ] It was reported that this strain effect caused the observed scattering of the aspect ratio.…”
Section: Size‐dependent Melting and The Interface Structurementioning
confidence: 99%