2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructure and β1-integrin distribution analysis of pig's spermatogonial stem cell by atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural information and mechanical properties of cell surface membranes are very important indicators for elucidating differentiation processes (Evans & Calderwood, ). We had tested the cellular membrane roughness of PSSCs in previous experiment (Li et al ., ), but without any other force index, such as stiffness force, adhesive force and Young's modulus which could reflect characteristics of PSSCs more completely. In this study, AFM were very useful in comparing the 3D morphology and other force features of undifferentiated and differentiated PSSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structural information and mechanical properties of cell surface membranes are very important indicators for elucidating differentiation processes (Evans & Calderwood, ). We had tested the cellular membrane roughness of PSSCs in previous experiment (Li et al ., ), but without any other force index, such as stiffness force, adhesive force and Young's modulus which could reflect characteristics of PSSCs more completely. In this study, AFM were very useful in comparing the 3D morphology and other force features of undifferentiated and differentiated PSSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic force microscopy was performed as described previously to reveal the cellular ultrastructure and measures several cellular mechanical properties of the PSSCs (Li et al ., ). In brief, the cells were placed in an incubation solution (DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS, 1000 IU ml −1 LIF and 20 ng ml −1 GDNF, 10 ml) and then seeded onto clean coverslips for 3–5 min to allow for adherence; the coverslips were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 15 min before use, washed with pure water for three times and air‐dried.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Oxidative stress related to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has also been associated with cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in various systems (Dragin et al, 2006;Abrahan et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2010). Se is the catalytic center of several antioxidant enzymes and proteins such as glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and selenoprotein P, some of which are involved in the regulation of oxidative microenvironment (Rotruck et al, 1973;Carlson et al, 2009;Wayne and Zeynep, 2010;Li et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shortcomings could be addressed by identification of SSC markers and also by examining the factors that regulate the fate of SSCs during in vitro culture. Although putative SSC markers, such as GDNF family receptor α-1 (GFRα-1), α 6 β 1 -integrins, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF; ZBTB16), thymus cell antigen-1 (Thy-1, CD90), LIN28, E-cadherin type 1 (CDH1), POU domain class 5 homeobox 1 (POU5F1) and Nanos 2 and 3 are promising candidates for purification and characterization of SSCs in a number of species [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], the definite characterization of “true” SSCs is confirmed if these cells can colonize and produce sperm following transplantation into the recipient's seminiferous tubules [5]. To date, GFRα-1 receptor is mostly used as a consensus marker for SSC identification in several species, including rodents [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%